3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit b0918d9f476a8434b055e362b83fa4fd1d462c3f upstream.
udf_next_aext() just follows extent pointers while extents are marked as
indirect. This can loop forever for corrupted filesystem. Limit number
the of indirect extents we are willing to follow in a row.
[JK: Updated changelog, limit, style]
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/udf/inode.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -2055,14 +2055,29 @@ void udf_write_aext(struct inode *inode,
epos->offset += adsize;
}
+/*
+ * Only 1 indirect extent in a row really makes sense but allow upto 16 in case
+ * someone does some weird stuff.
+ */
+#define UDF_MAX_INDIR_EXTS 16
+
int8_t udf_next_aext(struct inode *inode, struct extent_position *epos,
struct kernel_lb_addr *eloc, uint32_t *elen, int inc)
{
int8_t etype;
+ unsigned int indirections = 0;
while ((etype = udf_current_aext(inode, epos, eloc, elen, inc)) ==
(EXT_NEXT_EXTENT_ALLOCDECS >> 30)) {
int block;
+
+ if (++indirections > UDF_MAX_INDIR_EXTS) {
+ udf_err(inode->i_sb,
+ "too many indirect extents in inode %lu\n",
+ inode->i_ino);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
epos->block = *eloc;
epos->offset = sizeof(struct allocExtDesc);
brelse(epos->bh);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html