Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:20:18PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 02/14/2016 02:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.97 release.
> >There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Tue Feb 16 22:22:07 UTC 2016.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> More early feedback: Patch 'EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest comparisons'
> should be dropped because crypto_memneq() does not exist in v3.10.
> 
> This causes a build error in x86_64:allyesconfig and i386:allyesconfig.
> 
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c: In function 'evm_verify_hmac':
> security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c:132:3: error:
> 	implicit declaration of function 'crypto_memneq'

Now deleted, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]