On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:27:50AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 14-06-13 14:31:24, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.9-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > Patch doesn't apply to 3.9 because the bug has been introduced by > 5f578161 (memcg: relax memcg iter caching) merged after 3.9. > Sorry, I should have spotted this earlier. I noted the version range like this: > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> [3.10+] Greg, is there a better way to communicate this perhaps? I'm not sure how much overhead it would save for you or if these applications to different trees are fairly automated anyway. I would keep the annotations either way because it makes it easy to check if the tree where the patch failed needs a backport or not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html