On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 10:55 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > 3.2.47-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit 73c79617596b89a3693ff0d89d42bcd5ddedcf15 upstream.
>
> This SHA1 seems to be wrong, you probably meant
> 531671cb17af07281e6f28c1425f754346e65c41.
What I did here was to resolve the slightly different context by
substituting in the patch I'd already applied to Debian.
I failed to notice that the same change had been committed on two
branches - the one above is for the earlier commit which is only in
wireless-next. I also failed to add my Signed-off-by.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to chance.
- Robert Coveyou
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part