On Saturday, June 15, 2013 06:05:31 PM Jiang Liu wrote: > On 06/15/2013 02:51 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Changeset "3b63aaa70e1 PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver > >> mechanism" causes a regression which breaks ACPI dock support, > >> please refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59501 > >> > >> The root cause is that changeset 3b63aaa70e1 changed the relative > >> initialization order of ACPI dock subsystem and acpiphp driver, > >> and acpiphp driver has dependency on ACPI dock subsystem's > >> initialization result, so that acpiphp can't correctly detect ACPI > >> dock stations now. > >> > >> On the other hand, ACPI dock is a built-in driver, so we could > >> explicitly initialize it before the acpiphp driver is used. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Reported-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Tested-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.9+ > >> --- > >> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +------ > >> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 +++++ > >> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 + > >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c > >> index 4fdea38..02b0563 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c > >> @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ find_dock_and_bay(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv) > >> return AE_OK; > >> } > >> > >> -static int __init dock_init(void) > >> +int __init acpi_dock_init(void) > >> { > >> if (acpi_disabled) > >> return 0; > >> @@ -1062,9 +1062,4 @@ static void __exit dock_exit(void) > >> dock_remove(dock_station); > >> } > >> > >> -/* > >> - * Must be called before drivers of devices in dock, otherwise we can't know > >> - * which devices are in a dock > >> - */ > >> -subsys_initcall(dock_init); > >> module_exit(dock_exit); > > > > why not remove dock_exit? > I have a pending patchset to clean up dock driver, Rafael suggested to > focus on bugfix first, so I will send out the clean up patchset later. Well, you can remove dock_exit() in the same patch. This is kind of not directly related to the fix, but since you're changing it from modular to non-modular, it'd be prudent to remove all of the "modular" code in the process. Thanks, Rafael > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > >> index 297cbf4..c610a76 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > >> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ void acpi_container_init(void); > >> #else > >> static inline void acpi_container_init(void) {} > >> #endif > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK > >> +void acpi_dock_init(void); > >> +#else > >> +static inline void acpi_dock_init(void) {} > >> +#endif > >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY > >> void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(void); > >> #else > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > >> index 44225cb..4148163 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > >> @@ -2045,6 +2045,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void) > >> acpi_lpss_init(); > >> acpi_container_init(); > >> acpi_memory_hotplug_init(); > >> + acpi_dock_init(); > >> > >> mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock); > >> /* > >> -- > >> 1.8.1.2 > >> > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html