On Friday, June 14, 2013 06:30:58 PM Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > 2013/6/14 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>: > > > What about the appended patch (on top of [1/9], untested)? > > > > Rafael > > Sorry, I have lost the track of which patches, on top of 3.10-rc5, I > should include in my testing and which I shouldn't. Could you please > restore my understanding? I.e., please provide a full list of LKML or > Bugzilla links to patches which I should test during the next boot of > the laptop. > > Thanks in advance. As far as I'm concerned, please test these two for now: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2717851/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2721271/ They are targeted at the ordering problems only, however, so they won't address the resource allocation issues you're seeing. There are some other patches Jiang Liu and Yinghai are working on as far as I can say, but I'm not sure what their status is at the moment. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html