On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:16:50PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > The power up/down sequence order for DAPM switch widgets is not explicitly > initialized, causing them to be run always as the first widget type for both > power up and down. Move it to the same position in the sequence as other mixer > widget types. Applied all, thanks. > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx but this seems a bit hasty - there are existing users of this who haven't been complianing, changing the sequencing underneath them may cause some unintended breakage if they've somehow been relying on the existing behaviour. It doesn't seem safe enough for a stable fix, people ought to be able to blindly take the stable kernel updates.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature