3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 07a5d38453599052aff0877b16bb9c1585f08609 ]
dst_release should not access dst->flags after decrementing
__refcnt to 0. The dst_entry may be in dst_busy_list and
dst_gc_task may dst_destroy it before dst_release gets a chance
to access dst->flags.
Fixes: d69bbf88c8d0 ("net: fix a race in dst_release()")
Fixes: 27b75c95f10d ("net: avoid RCU for NOCACHE dst")
Signed-off-by: Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/dst.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/core/dst.c
+++ b/net/core/dst.c
@@ -280,10 +280,11 @@ void dst_release(struct dst_entry *dst)
{
if (dst) {
int newrefcnt;
+ unsigned short nocache = dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE;
newrefcnt = atomic_dec_return(&dst->__refcnt);
WARN_ON(newrefcnt < 0);
- if (!newrefcnt && unlikely(dst->flags & DST_NOCACHE))
+ if (!newrefcnt && unlikely(nocache))
call_rcu(&dst->rcu_head, dst_destroy_rcu);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html