Hi Sarah, Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:04:43PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote: >> Hi, >> >> While working on 3.5 kernel, I came across commit >> >> c3897aa5386faba77e5bbdf94902a1658d3a5b11 xhci: Disable D3cold for buggy TI redrivers. >> >> which states: >> >> This patch should be backported to kernels as old as 3.2, that >> contain the commit 71c731a296f1b08a3724bd1b514b64f1bda87a23 "usb: host: >> xhci: Fix Compliance Mode on SN65LVPE502CP Hardware" >> >> However, this commit actually makes usage of no_d3cold field in >> struct pci_dev, which doesn't exist in older kernels: >> >> + if (xhci_compliance_mode_recovery_timer_quirk_check()) >> + pdev->no_d3cold = true; >> >> Could someone advise on this? If this patch really is applicable to >> this kernel, can we get some help on the backport (at least for the >> 3.2, 3.4 and 3.5 kernels)? > > If the stable kernel doesn't include support for D3 cold, you don't need > that patch. Ying, when did D3 cold support go in? I believe the D3 cold support was implemented with commit 448bd857d48e69b33ef323739dc6d8ca20d4cda7 PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support Which, according to git, was introduced in 3.6: $ git name-rev --name-only 448bd857d48e69b33ef323739dc6d8ca20d4cda7 tags/v3.6-rc1~112^2~9^2~1 Assuming the above is correct, commit c3897aa5386faba77e5bbdf94902a1658d3a5b11 does not require to be backported to older kernels even if they contain 71c731a296f1b08a3724bd1b514b64f1bda87a23, contradicting the commit text. Is this correct? Cheers, -- Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html