3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 1b8e6a01e19f001e9f93b39c32387961c91ed3cc ]
When a passive TCP is created, we eventually call tcp_md5_do_add()
with sk pointing to the child. It is not owner by the user yet (we
will add this socket into listener accept queue a bit later anyway)
But we do own the spinlock, so amend the lockdep annotation to avoid
following splat :
[ 8451.090932] net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:923 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
[ 8451.090932]
[ 8451.090932] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 8451.090932]
[ 8451.090934]
[ 8451.090934] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 8451.090936] 3 locks held by socket_sockopt_/214795:
[ 8451.090936] #0: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff855c6ac1>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x151/0xe90
[ 8451.090947] #1: (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff85618143>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x43/0x2b0
[ 8451.090952] #2: (slock-AF_INET){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff855acda5>] sk_clone_lock+0x1c5/0x500
[ 8451.090958]
[ 8451.090958] stack backtrace:
[ 8451.090960] CPU: 7 PID: 214795 Comm: socket_sockopt_
[ 8451.091215] Call Trace:
[ 8451.091216] <IRQ> [<ffffffff856fb29c>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[ 8451.091229] [<ffffffff85123b5b>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xeb/0x110
[ 8451.091235] [<ffffffff8564544f>] tcp_md5_do_add+0x1bf/0x1e0
[ 8451.091239] [<ffffffff85645751>] tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock+0x1f1/0x4c0
[ 8451.091242] [<ffffffff85642b27>] ? tcp_v4_md5_hash_skb+0x167/0x190
[ 8451.091246] [<ffffffff85647c78>] tcp_check_req+0x3c8/0x500
[ 8451.091249] [<ffffffff856451ae>] ? tcp_v4_inbound_md5_hash+0x11e/0x190
[ 8451.091253] [<ffffffff85647170>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x3c0/0x9f0
[ 8451.091256] [<ffffffff85618143>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x43/0x2b0
[ 8451.091260] [<ffffffff856181b6>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xb6/0x2b0
[ 8451.091263] [<ffffffff85618143>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x43/0x2b0
[ 8451.091267] [<ffffffff85618d38>] ip_local_deliver+0x48/0x80
[ 8451.091270] [<ffffffff85618510>] ip_rcv_finish+0x160/0x700
[ 8451.091273] [<ffffffff8561900e>] ip_rcv+0x29e/0x3d0
[ 8451.091277] [<ffffffff855c74b7>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0xb47/0xe90
Fixes: a8afca0329988 ("tcp: md5: protects md5sig_info with RCU")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,8 @@ int tcp_md5_do_add(struct sock *sk, cons
}
md5sig = rcu_dereference_protected(tp->md5sig_info,
- sock_owned_by_user(sk));
+ sock_owned_by_user(sk) ||
+ lockdep_is_held(&sk->sk_lock.slock));
if (!md5sig) {
md5sig = kmalloc(sizeof(*md5sig), gfp);
if (!md5sig)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html