This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: unix-avoid-use-after-free-in-ep_remove_wait_queue.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From foo@baz Fri Dec 11 11:39:13 EST 2015 From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:07:23 +0000 Subject: unix: avoid use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 7d267278a9ece963d77eefec61630223fce08c6c ] Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: An AF_UNIX datagram socket being the client in an n:1 association with some server socket is only allowed to send messages to the server if the receive queue of this socket contains at most sk_max_ack_backlog datagrams. This implies that prospective writers might be forced to go to sleep despite none of the message presently enqueued on the server receive queue were sent by them. In order to ensure that these will be woken up once space becomes again available, the present unix_dgram_poll routine does a second sock_poll_wait call with the peer_wait wait queue of the server socket as queue argument (unix_dgram_recvmsg does a wake up on this queue after a datagram was received). This is inherently problematic because the server socket is only guaranteed to remain alive for as long as the client still holds a reference to it. In case the connection is dissolved via connect or by the dead peer detection logic in unix_dgram_sendmsg, the server socket may be freed despite "the polling mechanism" (in particular, epoll) still has a pointer to the corresponding peer_wait queue. There's no way to forcibly deregister a wait queue with epoll. Based on an idea by Jason Baron, the patch below changes the code such that a wait_queue_t belonging to the client socket is enqueued on the peer_wait queue of the server whenever the peer receive queue full condition is detected by either a sendmsg or a poll. A wake up on the peer queue is then relayed to the ordinary wait queue of the client socket via wake function. The connection to the peer wait queue is again dissolved if either a wake up is about to be relayed or the client socket reconnects or a dead peer is detected or the client socket is itself closed. This enables removing the second sock_poll_wait from unix_dgram_poll, thus avoiding the use-after-free, while still ensuring that no blocked writer sleeps forever. Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: ec0d215f9420 ("af_unix: fix 'poll for write'/connected DGRAM sockets") Reviewed-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/net/af_unix.h | 1 net/unix/af_unix.c | 183 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) --- a/include/net/af_unix.h +++ b/include/net/af_unix.h @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct unix_sock { #define UNIX_GC_CANDIDATE 0 #define UNIX_GC_MAYBE_CYCLE 1 struct socket_wq peer_wq; + wait_queue_t peer_wake; }; static inline struct unix_sock *unix_sk(struct sock *sk) --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -316,6 +316,118 @@ found: return s; } +/* Support code for asymmetrically connected dgram sockets + * + * If a datagram socket is connected to a socket not itself connected + * to the first socket (eg, /dev/log), clients may only enqueue more + * messages if the present receive queue of the server socket is not + * "too large". This means there's a second writeability condition + * poll and sendmsg need to test. The dgram recv code will do a wake + * up on the peer_wait wait queue of a socket upon reception of a + * datagram which needs to be propagated to sleeping would-be writers + * since these might not have sent anything so far. This can't be + * accomplished via poll_wait because the lifetime of the server + * socket might be less than that of its clients if these break their + * association with it or if the server socket is closed while clients + * are still connected to it and there's no way to inform "a polling + * implementation" that it should let go of a certain wait queue + * + * In order to propagate a wake up, a wait_queue_t of the client + * socket is enqueued on the peer_wait queue of the server socket + * whose wake function does a wake_up on the ordinary client socket + * wait queue. This connection is established whenever a write (or + * poll for write) hit the flow control condition and broken when the + * association to the server socket is dissolved or after a wake up + * was relayed. + */ + +static int unix_dgram_peer_wake_relay(wait_queue_t *q, unsigned mode, int flags, + void *key) +{ + struct unix_sock *u; + wait_queue_head_t *u_sleep; + + u = container_of(q, struct unix_sock, peer_wake); + + __remove_wait_queue(&unix_sk(u->peer_wake.private)->peer_wait, + q); + u->peer_wake.private = NULL; + + /* relaying can only happen while the wq still exists */ + u_sleep = sk_sleep(&u->sk); + if (u_sleep) + wake_up_interruptible_poll(u_sleep, key); + + return 0; +} + +static int unix_dgram_peer_wake_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sock *other) +{ + struct unix_sock *u, *u_other; + int rc; + + u = unix_sk(sk); + u_other = unix_sk(other); + rc = 0; + spin_lock(&u_other->peer_wait.lock); + + if (!u->peer_wake.private) { + u->peer_wake.private = other; + __add_wait_queue(&u_other->peer_wait, &u->peer_wake); + + rc = 1; + } + + spin_unlock(&u_other->peer_wait.lock); + return rc; +} + +static void unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect(struct sock *sk, + struct sock *other) +{ + struct unix_sock *u, *u_other; + + u = unix_sk(sk); + u_other = unix_sk(other); + spin_lock(&u_other->peer_wait.lock); + + if (u->peer_wake.private == other) { + __remove_wait_queue(&u_other->peer_wait, &u->peer_wake); + u->peer_wake.private = NULL; + } + + spin_unlock(&u_other->peer_wait.lock); +} + +static void unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect_wakeup(struct sock *sk, + struct sock *other) +{ + unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect(sk, other); + wake_up_interruptible_poll(sk_sleep(sk), + POLLOUT | + POLLWRNORM | + POLLWRBAND); +} + +/* preconditions: + * - unix_peer(sk) == other + * - association is stable + */ +static int unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(struct sock *sk, struct sock *other) +{ + int connected; + + connected = unix_dgram_peer_wake_connect(sk, other); + + if (unix_recvq_full(other)) + return 1; + + if (connected) + unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect(sk, other); + + return 0; +} + static inline int unix_writable(struct sock *sk) { return (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) << 2) <= sk->sk_sndbuf; @@ -420,6 +532,8 @@ static void unix_release_sock(struct soc skpair->sk_state_change(skpair); sk_wake_async(skpair, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_HUP); } + + unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect(sk, skpair); sock_put(skpair); /* It may now die */ unix_peer(sk) = NULL; } @@ -648,6 +762,7 @@ static struct sock *unix_create1(struct INIT_LIST_HEAD(&u->link); mutex_init(&u->readlock); /* single task reading lock */ init_waitqueue_head(&u->peer_wait); + init_waitqueue_func_entry(&u->peer_wake, unix_dgram_peer_wake_relay); unix_insert_socket(unix_sockets_unbound(sk), sk); out: if (sk == NULL) @@ -1015,6 +1130,8 @@ restart: if (unix_peer(sk)) { struct sock *old_peer = unix_peer(sk); unix_peer(sk) = other; + unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect_wakeup(sk, old_peer); + unix_state_double_unlock(sk, other); if (other != old_peer) @@ -1453,6 +1570,7 @@ static int unix_dgram_sendmsg(struct soc struct scm_cookie scm; int max_level; int data_len = 0; + int sk_locked; wait_for_unix_gc(); err = scm_send(sock, msg, &scm, false); @@ -1532,12 +1650,14 @@ restart: goto out_free; } + sk_locked = 0; unix_state_lock(other); +restart_locked: err = -EPERM; if (!unix_may_send(sk, other)) goto out_unlock; - if (sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD)) { + if (unlikely(sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD))) { /* * Check with 1003.1g - what should * datagram error @@ -1545,10 +1665,14 @@ restart: unix_state_unlock(other); sock_put(other); + if (!sk_locked) + unix_state_lock(sk); + err = 0; - unix_state_lock(sk); if (unix_peer(sk) == other) { unix_peer(sk) = NULL; + unix_dgram_peer_wake_disconnect_wakeup(sk, other); + unix_state_unlock(sk); unix_dgram_disconnected(sk, other); @@ -1574,21 +1698,38 @@ restart: goto out_unlock; } - if (unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other)) { - if (!timeo) { - err = -EAGAIN; - goto out_unlock; + if (unlikely(unix_peer(other) != sk && unix_recvq_full(other))) { + if (timeo) { + timeo = unix_wait_for_peer(other, timeo); + + err = sock_intr_errno(timeo); + if (signal_pending(current)) + goto out_free; + + goto restart; } - timeo = unix_wait_for_peer(other, timeo); + if (!sk_locked) { + unix_state_unlock(other); + unix_state_double_lock(sk, other); + } - err = sock_intr_errno(timeo); - if (signal_pending(current)) - goto out_free; + if (unix_peer(sk) != other || + unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(sk, other)) { + err = -EAGAIN; + sk_locked = 1; + goto out_unlock; + } - goto restart; + if (!sk_locked) { + sk_locked = 1; + goto restart_locked; + } } + if (unlikely(sk_locked)) + unix_state_unlock(sk); + if (sock_flag(other, SOCK_RCVTSTAMP)) __net_timestamp(skb); maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other); @@ -1602,6 +1743,8 @@ restart: return len; out_unlock: + if (sk_locked) + unix_state_unlock(sk); unix_state_unlock(other); out_free: kfree_skb(skb); @@ -2245,14 +2388,16 @@ static unsigned int unix_dgram_poll(stru return mask; writable = unix_writable(sk); - other = unix_peer_get(sk); - if (other) { - if (unix_peer(other) != sk) { - sock_poll_wait(file, &unix_sk(other)->peer_wait, wait); - if (unix_recvq_full(other)) - writable = 0; - } - sock_put(other); + if (writable) { + unix_state_lock(sk); + + other = unix_peer(sk); + if (other && unix_peer(other) != sk && + unix_recvq_full(other) && + unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(sk, other)) + writable = 0; + + unix_state_unlock(sk); } if (writable) Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rweikusat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.1/unix-avoid-use-after-free-in-ep_remove_wait_queue.patch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html