4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 48900cb6af4282fa0fb6ff4d72a81aa3dadb5c39 ]
virtio declares support for NETIF_F_FRAGLIST, but assumes
that there are at most MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2 fragments which isn't
always true with a fraglist.
A longer fraglist in the skb will make the call to skb_to_sgvec overflow
the sg array, leading to memory corruption.
Drop NETIF_F_FRAGLIST so we only get what we can handle.
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1756,9 +1756,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_d
/* Do we support "hardware" checksums? */
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM)) {
/* This opens up the world of extra features. */
- dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM|NETIF_F_SG|NETIF_F_FRAGLIST;
+ dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
if (csum)
- dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM|NETIF_F_SG|NETIF_F_FRAGLIST;
+ dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_SG;
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO)) {
dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_UFO
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html