[PATCH 4.1 49/95] NFC: nci: extract pipe value using NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_PIPE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@xxxxxxxxx>

commit e65917b6d54f8b47d8293ea96adfa604fd46cf0d upstream.

When receiving data in nci_hci_msg_rx_work, extract pipe
value using NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_PIPE macro.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Ricard <christophe-h.ricard@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 net/nfc/nci/hci.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void nci_hci_msg_rx_work(struct w
 	u8 pipe, type, instruction;
 
 	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&hdev->msg_rx_queue)) != NULL) {
-		pipe = skb->data[0];
+		pipe = NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_PIPE(skb->data[0]);
 		skb_pull(skb, NCI_HCI_HCP_PACKET_HEADER_LEN);
 		message = (struct nci_hcp_message *)skb->data;
 		type = NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_TYPE(message->header);
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ void nci_hci_data_received_cb(void *cont
 
 	/* it's the last fragment. Does it need re-aggregation? */
 	if (skb_queue_len(&ndev->hci_dev->rx_hcp_frags)) {
-		pipe = packet->header & NCI_HCI_FRAGMENT;
+		pipe = NCI_HCP_MSG_GET_PIPE(packet->header);
 		skb_queue_tail(&ndev->hci_dev->rx_hcp_frags, skb);
 
 		msg_len = 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]