3.13.11-ckt30 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> commit 9702970c7bd3e2d6fecb642a190269131d4ac16c upstream. This reverts commit e306dfd06fcb44d21c80acb8e5a88d55f3d1cf63. With this patch applied, we were the only architecture making this sort of adjustment to the PC calculation in the unwinder. This causes problems for ftrace, where the PC values are matched against the contents of the stack frames in the callchain and fail to match any records after the address adjustment. Whilst there has been some effort to change ftrace to workaround this, those patches are not yet ready for mainline and, since we're the odd architecture in this regard, let's just step in line with other architectures (like arch/arm/) for now. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c index 048334b..d25459f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -48,11 +48,7 @@ int unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame) frame->sp = fp + 0x10; frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp); - /* - * -4 here because we care about the PC at time of bl, - * not where the return will go. - */ - frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 8) - 4; + frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 8); return 0; } -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html