On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:42:26PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> This patch fixes obvious copy-past error in wake up irq parsing
> code which leads to the fact that dev_pm_set_wake_irq() will
> be called with wrong IRQ number when "wakeup" IRQ is not
> defined in DT.
>
> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.3
> Fixes: 3fffd1283927 ("i2c: allow specifying separate wakeup interrupt in device tree")
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
I wonder if we should change dev_pm_set_wake_irq and
dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq to check if passed in IRQ is valid.
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 040af5c..ba8eb08 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
> if (wakeirq > 0 && wakeirq != client->irq)
> status = dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, wakeirq);
> else if (client->irq > 0)
> - status = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, wakeirq);
> + status = dev_pm_set_wake_irq(dev, client->irq);
> else
> status = 0;
>
> --
> 2.6.3
>
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html