Re: stop_machine lockup issue in 3.9.y.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/05/2013 02:11 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
(cc'ing wireless crowd, tglx and Ingo.  The original thread is at
  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1500158/focus=55005 )

Hello, Ben.

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:58:31PM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
Hmm, wonder if I found it.  I previously saw times where it appears
jiffies does not increment.  __do_softirq has a break-out based on
jiffies timeout.  Maybe that is failing to get us out of __do_softirq
in my lockup case because for whatever reason the system cannot update
jiffies in this case?

I added this (probably whitespace damaged) hack and now I have not been
able to reproduce the problem.

Ah, nice catch. :)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 14d7758..621ea3b 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
         unsigned long end = jiffies + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME;
         int cpu;
         unsigned long old_flags = current->flags;
+       unsigned long loops = 0;

         /*
          * Mask out PF_MEMALLOC s current task context is borrowed for the
@@ -241,6 +242,7 @@ restart:
                         unsigned int vec_nr = h - softirq_vec;
                         int prev_count = preempt_count();

+                       loops++;
                         kstat_incr_softirqs_this_cpu(vec_nr);

                         trace_softirq_entry(vec_nr);
@@ -265,7 +267,7 @@ restart:

         pending = local_softirq_pending();
         if (pending) {
-               if (time_before(jiffies, end) && !need_resched())
+               if (time_before(jiffies, end) && !need_resched() && (loops < 500))
                         goto restart;

So, softirq most likely kicked off from ath9k is rescheduling itself
to the extent where it ends up locking out the CPU completely.  The
problem is usually okay because the processing would break out in 2ms
but as jiffies is stopped in this case with all other CPUs trapped in
stop_machine, the loop never breaks and the machine hangs.  While
adding the counter limit probably isn't a bad idea, softirq requeueing
itself indefinitely sounds pretty buggy.

Just to be clear on the ath9k part for the wifi folks:

This is basically un-patched 3.9.4, but I have 200 virtual stations
configured on each of two ath9k radios.  I cannot reproduce the problem
without ath9k, but I do not know for certain ath9k is the real
culprit.

In the case where I can most easily reproduce the lockup, ath9k virtual
stations would be trying to associate, so I'd expect a fair amount
of packet processing to be happening...

ath9k people, do you guys have any idea what's going on?  Why would
softirq repeat itself indefinitely?

Ingo, Thomas, we're seeing a stop_machine hanging because

* All other CPUs entered IRQ disabled stage.  Jiffies is not being
   updated.

* The last CPU get caught up executing softirq indefinitely.  As
   jiffies doesn't get updated, it never breaks out of softirq
   handling.  This is a deadlock.  This CPU won't break out of softirq
   handling unless jiffies is updated and other CPUs can't do anything
   until this CPU enters the same stop_machine stage.

Ben found out that breaking out of softirq handling after certain
number of repetitions makes the issue go away, which isn't a proper
fix but we might want anyway.  What do you guys think?

Thanks,
Ben



--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]