Re: [PATCH 4.1 00/46] 4.1.12-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/23/2015 04:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:34:56PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 10/23/2015 11:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.12 release.
There are 46 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sun Oct 25 17:46:11 UTC 2015.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.1.12-rc1.gz
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h


I am seeing the following compile error (was seen in 4.2.4-rc1)

In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
                  from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
                  from ./include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
                  from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13,
                  from include/linux/types.h:5,
                  from include/uapi/linux/capability.h:16,
                  from include/linux/capability.h:15,
                  from include/linux/sched.h:15,
                  from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12:
drivers/xen/preempt.c: In function ‘xen_maybe_preempt_hcall’:
drivers/xen/preempt.c:34:11: error: too few arguments to function
‘should_resched’
         && should_resched())) {
            ^
include/linux/compiler.h:164:42: note: in definition of macro ‘unlikely’
  # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                                           ^
In file included from include/linux/preempt.h:18:0,
                  from include/linux/spinlock.h:50,
                  from include/linux/seqlock.h:35,
                  from include/linux/time.h:5,
                  from include/uapi/linux/timex.h:56,
                  from include/linux/timex.h:56,
                  from include/linux/sched.h:19,
                  from drivers/xen/preempt.c:12:
./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:93:29: note: declared here
  static __always_inline bool should_resched(int preempt_offset)
                              ^
scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'drivers/xen/preempt.o' failed
make[2]: *** [drivers/xen/preempt.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
scripts/Makefile.build:403: recipe for target 'drivers/xen' failed
make[1]: *** [drivers/xen] Error 2
Makefile:947: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
make: *** [drivers] Error 2

Also for powerpc:

arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c: In function 'kvmppc_run_vcpu':
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c:2181:3: error: too few arguments to function 'should_resched'

[ Didn't we have that before ? ]

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]