Ben Hutchings wrote at Tuesday, June 04, 2013 6:46 PM:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 10:07 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Stephen Warren wrote at Monday, June 03, 2013 11:03 AM:
> > > From: Dimitris Papastamos <dp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > In the rbtree code we are exposing statistics relating to the
> > > number of nodes/registers of the rbtree cache for each of the
> > > devices. Ensure that `map->debugfs' has been initialized before
> > > we attempt to initialize the debugfs entry for the rbtree cache.
> >
> > Please disregard this, and patch 2/6 immediately after it. I forgot to
> > pass --suppress-cc= to git send-email. Sorry.
>
> There's nothing wrong with cc'ing stable at the same time you submit a
> patch for inclusion in mainline. The thing that people sometimes do
> wrong is to cc stable without also putting a cc pseudo-header inline.
Sure, I wasn't doing that though; I was intending to send the patches
solely to an internal email list for use in a downstream kernel. I believe
the patches in question are already in (or at least submitted for) stable
upstream by the original author/committer. Sorry for the noise.
--
nvpublic
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f