On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:00 +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote: > On 06/03/2013 10:28 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:52:58PM +0800, Xufeng Zhang wrote: > > > >> 3.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > >> > > Really? What are you going to do with it if no one objects? > > > Sorry, I don't have any experience with stable patch and I consult > stable_kernel_rules.txt, there are not much special rules and here I just > want to specify the kernel version I wish it to be applied to. > > > I know I'm sure not going to do anything with it... > > > > (hint, this isn't how you ask for networking stable patches to be > > applied.) > > > Ok, thanks for your hint, I'll resend the patch. The heading you used should only be used by a stable branch maintainer sending out a series of patches they've already accepted, prior to making a new release. If you want a fix to be added to be applied to one or more stable branches, you should write in the form of a request. And if you're just not sure, then you should write in the form of a question. Networking is a special case in that the subsystem maintainer, David Miller, generally collects together and backports fixes for all the official 3.x branches. So you should send your request to him (but do cc the stable and subsystem lists as well). Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part