4.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 306a5549355966e480e0dcacdc6b9321d153e0c0 upstream.
We're incorrectly assigning a loff_t return to an int. If SEEK_HOLE or
SEEK_DATA returns an offset over 2^31 then the application will see a
weird lseek() result (usually -EIO).
Fixes: bdcc2cd14e4e "NFSv4.2: handle NFS-specific llseek errors"
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42proc.c
@@ -175,10 +175,12 @@ loff_t nfs42_proc_llseek(struct file *fi
{
struct nfs_server *server = NFS_SERVER(file_inode(filep));
struct nfs4_exception exception = { };
- int err;
+ loff_t err;
do {
err = _nfs42_proc_llseek(filep, offset, whence);
+ if (err >= 0)
+ break;
if (err == -ENOTSUPP)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
err = nfs4_handle_exception(server, err, &exception);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html