2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> commit b3449922502f5a161ee2b5022a33aec8472fbf18 upstream Preparation. Add the new trivial helper, umh_complete(). Currently it simply does complete(sub_info->complete). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [dannf: Adjusted to apply to Debian's 2.6.32] Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx> --- kernel/kmod.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c index a061472..2a27d17 100644 --- a/kernel/kmod.c +++ b/kernel/kmod.c @@ -206,6 +206,11 @@ void call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(struct subprocess_info *info) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_usermodehelper_freeinfo); +static void umh_complete(struct subprocess_info *sub_info) +{ + complete(sub_info->complete); +} + /* Keventd can't block, but this (a child) can. */ static int wait_for_helper(void *data) { @@ -245,7 +250,7 @@ static int wait_for_helper(void *data) if (sub_info->wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info); else - complete(sub_info->complete); + umh_complete(sub_info); return 0; } @@ -280,7 +285,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct work_struct *work) /* FALLTHROUGH */ case UMH_WAIT_EXEC: - complete(sub_info->complete); + umh_complete(sub_info); } } -- 1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html