On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 11:33 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 05:26:53PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: > > Michael and Peter, rest of this patchset depends on commits which are > > currently in the locking/core branch of the tip, so I would like it as a > > whole queued there. Besides, I will keep this patch Cc'ed to stable in > > future versions, that works for you both? > > From my POV having the Cc stable in there is fine if Michael actually > wants them to go there. GregKH will vacuum them up once they hit Linus' > tree and we don't need to think about it anymore. Yeah that's fine by me. Here's an Ack if you want one: Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Alternatively, Michael could put the patch in a separate branch and we > could both merge that. > > Or even, seeing how its a single patch and git mostly does the right > thing, we could just merge it independently in both trees and let git > sort it out at merge time. That probably would work, but I don't think it's necessary. My tree doesn't get much (or any) more testing than linux-next, so as long as locking/core is in linux-next then it will be tested just fine that way. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html