On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:04:38PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > I had some ideas that layouts were something a server could decline just > on random whim. Rereading that section.... OK, looks like I was > confused, TRYLATER is the closest we come to random whim. > > So the following condition on the alignments of the offset also looks > wrong. Christoph, should it be rounding the offset down instead of > rejecting in that case? RFC5663 is very explicit about the extents being aligned, but doesn't say anything about LAYOUTGET requests. It's a bit of a gray area, but I think not handing out a layout is still the best thing to do as a client has to be really confused to ask for an unaligned layout and expect to get an aligned extent back. I just need to check for the best possible error value. > And other layoutunavailable cases might need review too. Will do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html