Hello,
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> W dniu 09.10.2015 o 01:45, Alim Akhtar pisze:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error exit path
>>> would still disable it. This could lead to unbalanced counter of
>>> regulator enable/disable.
>>>
>> Do you see a regulator unbalanced reported here during boot? You may
>> want to add that to commit message.
>
> I did not see the warning/error message about unbalanced disable. It
> would happen in certain condition only - no other enables of regulator
> and count going below 0.
>
> I would have to simulate this error to get the warning message. I don't
> think it is worth the effort.
>
Ok, looking at code, it does looks to be calling regulator disable in
case regulator enable fails.
Feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!!
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>>
>>> The patch moves code for getting and enabling the regulator from
>>> exynos_map_dt_data() to probe function because it is really not a part
>>> of getting Device Tree properties.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Fixes: 5f09a5cbd14a ("thermal: exynos: Disable the regulator on probe failure")
>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>> index 0bae8cc6c23a..23f4320f8ef7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>> @@ -1168,27 +1168,10 @@ static int exynos_map_dt_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> struct exynos_tmu_data *data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> struct exynos_tmu_platform_data *pdata;
>>> struct resource res;
>>> - int ret;
>>>
>>> if (!data || !pdev->dev.of_node)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>
>>> - /*
>>> - * Try enabling the regulator if found
>>> - * TODO: Add regulator as an SOC feature, so that regulator enable
>>> - * is a compulsory call.
>>> - */
>>> - data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu");
>>> - if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) {
>>> - ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator);
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n");
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> - } else {
>>> - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n");
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> data->id = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "tmuctrl");
>>> if (data->id < 0)
>>> data->id = 0;
>>> @@ -1312,6 +1295,23 @@ static int exynos_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> pr_err("thermal: tz: %p ERROR\n", data->tzd);
>>> return PTR_ERR(data->tzd);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Try enabling the regulator if found
>>> + * TODO: Add regulator as an SOC feature, so that regulator enable
>>> + * is a compulsory call.
>>> + */
>>> + data->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vtmu");
>>> + if (!IS_ERR(data->regulator)) {
>>> + ret = regulator_enable(data->regulator);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable vtmu\n");
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Regulator node (vtmu) not found\n");
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> ret = exynos_map_dt_data(pdev);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err_sensor;
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Regards,
Alim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html