Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ enum pci_dev_flags { > PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) 2, > /* Provide indication device is assigned by a Virtual Machine Manager */ > PCI_DEV_FLAGS_ASSIGNED = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) 4, > + /* Get VPD from function 0 VPD */ > + PCI_DEV_FLAGS_VPD_REF_F0 = (__force pci_dev_flags_t) (1 << 8), > }; > > enum pci_irq_reroute_variant { In this hunk I happened to notice the change in how these values are assigned. Should the new value remain (1 << 8) or should it fall in line with the older implementation and simply be 8? Or should it be 256? It depends on which kind of consistency you prefer for the backport. -- Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail