On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 12:02:54AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 02:21:01PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > We're trying to avoid the situation where where we have to ship > > > patches or maintain a separate kernel tree. > > > > > > Do you have any objections to these going into stable? > > > > I'm not the one you need to convince. That would be Greg :-) > > What's the git commit id of the patch in Linus's tree? the patch doesn't exist yet. John sent a series wich I don't feel it fits stable. The new device IDs, sure, but all the other changes which, granted, are related, but don't seem like stable material IMO. For reference, here are all the patches: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg130712.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg130711.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg130717.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg130713.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg130716.html http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg130714.html -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature