Re: [PATCH 3.12 16/33] isdn/gigaset: reset tty->receive_room when attaching ser_gigaset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 21.09.2015 um 18:54 schrieb Peter Hurley:
> On 09/21/2015 09:38 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> Am 21.09.2015 um 15:13 schrieb Peter Hurley:
>>> On 09/18/2015 08:38 AM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>>>> Am 17.09.2015 um 20:13 schrieb Peter Hurley:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Tilman Schmidt <tilman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>> - The requirement for line disciplines to set receive_room wasn't (and
>>>>>> btw still isn't) documented anywhere, so it's unlikely anything actively
>>>>>> relied on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nevertheless, that is the requirement, and what every other in-tree line
>>>>> discipline does.
>>>>
>>>> Your word for it. Still I don't understand the curious resistance to
>>>> documenting it. If it is the requirement, why keep it secret?
>>>
>>> Nothing sinister here :)
>>>
>>> Feel free to submit documentation patches.
>>
>> I already did. For some unknown reason nobody wants to merge them.
> 
> I vaguely recall that. A quick search reminded me there were unaddressed
> comments wrt that patch:  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/14/608

Ah, so that's the blocking condition? How can I address that comment in
order to unblock that patch?

-- 
Tilman Schmidt                              E-Mail: tilman@xxxxxxx
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]