4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit b265da5a45ce60bd3d7505cc0eaa6cfba50946a1 upstream.
Commit d795ef9aa831 ("arm64: perf: don't warn about missing
interrupt-affinity property for PPIs") added a check for PPIs so that
we avoid parsing the interrupt-affinity property for these naturally
affine interrupts.
Unfortunately, this check can trigger an early (successful) return and
we will not assign the value of cpu_pmu->plat_device. This patch fixes
the issue.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1318,7 +1318,7 @@ static int armpmu_device_probe(struct pl
/* Don't bother with PPIs; they're already affine */
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq))
- return 0;
+ goto out;
irqs = kcalloc(pdev->num_resources, sizeof(*irqs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!irqs)
@@ -1355,6 +1355,7 @@ static int armpmu_device_probe(struct pl
else
kfree(irqs);
+out:
cpu_pmu->plat_device = pdev;
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html