Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/44] 3.14.51-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 08:10:16AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 8:08 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > stable-queue boot: 183 boots: 0 failed, 182 passed with 1 conflict (v3.14.50-44-g7a148040468f)
> >
> > Full Boot Summary: http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.50-44-g7a148040468f/
> > Full Build Summary: http://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v3.14.50-44-g7a148040468f/
> >
> > Tree: stable-queue
> > Branch: local/linux-3.14.y-queue
> > Git Describe: v3.14.50-44-g7a148040468f
> > Git Commit: 7a148040468f41b14d8c3859cde00d15318f83d5
> > Git URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-stable.git
> > Tested: 48 unique boards, 16 SoC families, 23 builds out of 140
> >
> > Conflicting Boot Failure Detected: (These likely are not failures as other labs are reporting PASS. Needs review.)
> >
> > arm:
> >
> >     multi_v7_defconfig:
> >         am335x-boneblack:
> >             lab-khilman: PASS
> >             lab-cambridge: FAIL
> >             lab-tbaker: PASS
> 
> The same board working in 2 of 3 labs usually indicates some
> lab-specifiic issue, so this shouldn't be considered a new failure.
> We'll look into the lab.

Thanks for the testing.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]