Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/35] 3.10.87-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14 August 2015 at 12:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:25:41AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:24 AM, kernelci.org bot <bot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > stable-queue boot: 48 boots: 2 failed, 46 passed (v3.10.86-20-g7c711fb80b94)
>> >
>> > Full Boot Summary: http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v3.10.86-20-g7c711fb80b94/
>> > Full Build Summary: http://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v3.10.86-20-g7c711fb80b94/
>> >
>> > Tree: stable-queue
>> > Branch: local/linux-3.10.y-queue
>> > Git Describe: v3.10.86-20-g7c711fb80b94
>> > Git Commit: 7c711fb80b945f1a5c9b6c99b288889ec7b10a8c
>> > Git URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-stable.git
>> > Tested: 30 unique boards, 13 SoC families, 15 builds out of 137
>> >
>> > Boot Failures Detected: http://kernelci.org/boot/?v3.10.86-20-g7c711fb80b94&fail
>> >
>> > arm:
>> >
>> >     imx_v6_v7_defconfig:
>> >         imx6q-sabrelite: 1 failed lab
>> >         imx6q-sabrelite_rootfs:nfs: 1 failed lab
>>
>> FYI... these two boots are (somewhat) expected failures as that board
>> has become unstable.
>
> Any chance of removing that board from the test harness?  :)

Done, just pushed a change to blacklist it. Sorry for the noise!

Tyler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]