Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/27/2015 10:29 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> modify_ldt has questionable locking and does not synchronize
> threads.  Improve it: redesign the locking and synchronize all
> threads' LDTs using an IPI on all modifications.
> 
> This will dramatically slow down modify_ldt in multithreaded
> programs, but there shouldn't be any multithreaded programs that
> care about modify_ldt's performance in the first place.
> 

<nitpick>

... except 32-bit programs compiled with one specific version of glibc.
 Do we care?  I don't think so.

</nitpick>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]