Re: [PATCH 3.2 089/110] net: Clone skb before setting peeked flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10.08.2015 13:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2.71-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

Here is important fix: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/503374/
"net: Fix skb_set_peeked use-after-free". not in upstream yet.


------------------

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 738ac1ebb96d02e0d23bc320302a6ea94c612dec upstream.

Shared skbs must not be modified and this is crucial for broadcast
and/or multicast paths where we use it as an optimisation to avoid
unnecessary cloning.

The function skb_recv_datagram breaks this rule by setting peeked
without cloning the skb first.  This causes funky races which leads
to double-free.

This patch fixes this by cloning the skb and replacing the skb
in the list when setting skb->peeked.

Fixes: a59322be07c9 ("[UDP]: Only increment counter on first peek/recv")
Reported-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/core/datagram.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/datagram.c
+++ b/net/core/datagram.c
@@ -128,6 +128,35 @@ out_noerr:
  	goto out;
  }

+static int skb_set_peeked(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *nskb;
+
+	if (skb->peeked)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* We have to unshare an skb before modifying it. */
+	if (!skb_shared(skb))
+		goto done;
+
+	nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!nskb)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	skb->prev->next = nskb;
+	skb->next->prev = nskb;
+	nskb->prev = skb->prev;
+	nskb->next = skb->next;
+
+	consume_skb(skb);
+	skb = nskb;
+
+done:
+	skb->peeked = 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
  /**
   *	__skb_recv_datagram - Receive a datagram skbuff
   *	@sk: socket
@@ -160,7 +189,9 @@ out_noerr:
  struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, unsigned flags,
  				    int *peeked, int *err)
  {
+	struct sk_buff_head *queue = &sk->sk_receive_queue;
  	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	unsigned long cpu_flags;
  	long timeo;
  	/*
  	 * Caller is allowed not to check sk->sk_err before skb_recv_datagram()
@@ -179,15 +210,16 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(stru
  		 * Look at current nfs client by the way...
  		 * However, this function was correct in any case. 8)
  		 */
-		unsigned long cpu_flags;
-		struct sk_buff_head *queue = &sk->sk_receive_queue;
-
  		spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, cpu_flags);
  		skb = skb_peek(queue);
  		if (skb) {
  			*peeked = skb->peeked;
  			if (flags & MSG_PEEK) {
-				skb->peeked = 1;
+
+				error = skb_set_peeked(skb);
+				if (error)
+					goto unlock_err;
+
  				atomic_inc(&skb->users);
  			} else
  				__skb_unlink(skb, queue);
@@ -206,6 +238,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__skb_recv_datagram(stru

  	return NULL;

+unlock_err:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock, cpu_flags);
  no_packet:
  	*err = error;
  	return NULL;



--
Konstantin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]