3.19.8-ckt5 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 2c069a118fe1d80c47dca84e1561045fc7f3cc9e upstream.
The pointer to an AFU in the adapter's list of AFUs can be null
if we're in the process of removing AFUs. The afu_list_lock
doesn't guard against this.
Say we have 2 slices, and we're in the process of removing cxl.
- We remove the AFUs in order (see cxl_remove). In cxl_remove_afu
for AFU 0, we take the lock, set adapter->afu[0] = NULL, and
release the lock.
- Then we get an slbia. In cxl_slbia we take the lock, and set
afu = adapter->afu[0], which is NULL.
- Therefore our attempt to check afu->enabled will blow up.
Therefore, check if afu is a null pointer before dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/misc/cxl/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c
index 4cde9b6..619c7b4 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/main.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static inline void cxl_slbia_core(struct mm_struct *mm)
spin_lock(&adapter->afu_list_lock);
for (slice = 0; slice < adapter->slices; slice++) {
afu = adapter->afu[slice];
- if (!afu->enabled)
+ if (!afu || !afu->enabled)
continue;
rcu_read_lock();
idr_for_each_entry(&afu->contexts_idr, ctx, id)
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html