Re: Backport of "drm/i915: Fix detection of base of stolen memory"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:27 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> The 3.2.x stable backport patch
> 
> commit 53e587aa5ca81497d0ea6e340320ec5778d1f311
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu Nov 15 11:32:18 2012 +0000
> 
>     drm/i915: Fix detection of base of stolen memory
> 
> errornously added a stray return 0; at the wrong spot. It caused a
> modeset regression at boot for drm/i915. Since we don't ever use
> stolen mem for anything on 3.2 I think we can savely revert that patch
> again on 3.2. Upstream kernels (and other stable trees carrying this
> patch) seem to work fine.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58511#add_comment

Yes, I've already had a report that this is broken.  The revert is in my
patch queue.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]