Re: [PATCH] xhci: Add BayTrail to list of Intel switchable hosts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:37:55AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> > index 595d210..a5708d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> > @@ -322,7 +322,8 @@ static bool usb_is_intel_switchable_ehci(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  		(pdev->device == 0x1E26 ||
> >  		 pdev->device == 0x8C2D ||
> >  		 pdev->device == 0x8C26 ||
> > -		 pdev->device == 0x9C26);
> > +		 pdev->device == 0x9C26 ||
> > +		 pdev->device == 0x0F34);
> 
> The entries should be kept sorted in numerical order.  In fact, you 
> might even interchange the 0x8C2D and 0x8C26 entries.

OK.

> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
> > index 4c338ec..6062822 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
> > @@ -724,6 +724,7 @@ static int handshake(void __iomem *ptr, u32 mask, u32 done,
> >  
> >  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LYNX_POINT_XHCI	0x8C31
> >  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LYNX_POINT_LP_XHCI	0x9C31
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BYT_XHCI		0x0F35
> >  
> >  bool usb_is_intel_ppt_switchable_xhci(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  {
> > @@ -741,10 +742,19 @@ bool usb_is_intel_lpt_switchable_xhci(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  		 pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_LYNX_POINT_LP_XHCI);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* And so does the Intel BayTrail. */
> > +bool usb_is_intel_byt_switchable_xhci(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	return pdev->class == PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB_XHCI &&
> > +		pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL &&
> > +		pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_BYT_XHCI;
> > +}
> > +
> >  bool usb_is_intel_switchable_xhci(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	return usb_is_intel_ppt_switchable_xhci(pdev) ||
> > -		usb_is_intel_lpt_switchable_xhci(pdev);
> > +		usb_is_intel_lpt_switchable_xhci(pdev) ||
> > +		usb_is_intel_byt_switchable_xhci(pdev);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_is_intel_switchable_xhci);
> 
> This code cries out for refactoring.  Why test pdev->class and 
> pdev->vendor in the same way in three different places?  Those two 
> tests should be moved directly into usb_is_intel_switchable_xhci().
> 
> The other helper functions then become simple comparisons.  As far as
> I'm concerned, they also could be moved inline into
> usb_is_intel_switchable_xhci().  Sarah may disagree, however.

Sarah what do you think?

-- 
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]