3.2.45-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dmitry Popov <dp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit d66954a066158781ccf9c13c91d0316970fe57b6 ] There is a bug in cookie_v4_check (net/ipv4/syncookies.c): flowi4_init_output(&fl4, 0, sk->sk_mark, RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP, inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk), (opt && opt->srr) ? opt->faddr : ireq->rmt_addr, ireq->loc_addr, th->source, th->dest); Here we do not respect sk->sk_bound_dev_if, therefore wrong dst_entry may be taken. This dst_entry is used by new socket (get_cookie_sock -> tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock), so its packets may take the wrong path. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Popov <dp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/ipv4/syncookies.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c +++ b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c @@ -347,8 +347,8 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock * hasn't changed since we received the original syn, but I see * no easy way to do this. */ - flowi4_init_output(&fl4, 0, sk->sk_mark, RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), - RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP, + flowi4_init_output(&fl4, sk->sk_bound_dev_if, sk->sk_mark, + RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk), RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP, inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk), (opt && opt->srr) ? opt->faddr : ireq->rmt_addr, ireq->loc_addr, th->source, th->dest); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html