* Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:14:54AM -0600, jerry.hoemann@xxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > Greg, Yinghai, ... > > > > Have you guys had a chance to consider this patch? > > > > I understand that in general we want to only apply commits > > from upstream, but with the changes to init_memory_mapping in > > the 3.9 kernel the change below isn't applicable. > > > > I have looked into applying the upstream commits from Yinghai > > from Nov last year, this gets fairly involved and wasn't sure > > you'd want the larger change back ported. > > > > If you could let me know your views to one of the above or to > > a third approach I'd be most appreciative as we would like to > > have 3.0-stable based distros 3.0-stable pick up the eventual > > fix as the current code panics during boot on our new system > > with the right memory configurations. > > Now applied, thanks. Thanks Greg. As Jerry indicated it the full series of upstream commits is very involved and is far too risky for a -stable backport. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html