On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:20:44AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 17:02 +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
> > it?
>
> That would be only the setup.c chunk. That fixes a typo introduced in
> v3.4 (see commit e5ab85800820edd907d3f43f285e1232f84d5a41
> ("ARM: 7382/1: mm: truncate memory banks to fit in 4GB space for classic
> MMU")). So, if that chunk is deemed appropriate for stable, you could
> consider the v3.4.y longterm tree too.
Even then, I don't think it's worth backporting this patch. membank->start
and membank->size are phys_addr_t, so with LPAE enabled, this check won't
trigger anyway. The #ifndef is just there for readability really (since the
printk message explicitly refers to 32-bit physical addresses).
So I wouldn't bother with this.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html