This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
it?
------------------
From: "Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>"
commit cea15092f098b7018e89f64a5a14bb71955965d5 upstream
cyc_to_sched_clock() is called by sched_clock() and cyc_to_ns()
is called by cyc_to_sched_clock(). I suspect that some compilers
inline both of these functions into sched_clock() and so we've
been getting away without having a notrace marking. It seems that
my compiler isn't inlining cyc_to_sched_clock() though, so I'm
hitting a recursion bug when I enable the function graph tracer,
causing my system to crash. Marking these functions notrace fixes
it. Technically cyc_to_ns() doesn't need the notrace because it's
already marked inline, but let's just add it so that if we ever
remove inline from that function it doesn't blow up.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
index bd6f56b..59d2adb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c
@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ static u32 notrace jiffy_sched_clock_read(void)
static u32 __read_mostly (*read_sched_clock)(void) =
jiffy_sched_clock_read;
-static inline u64 cyc_to_ns(u64 cyc, u32 mult, u32 shift)
+static inline u64 notrace cyc_to_ns(u64 cyc, u32 mult, u32 shift)
{
return (cyc * mult) >> shift;
}
-static unsigned long long cyc_to_sched_clock(u32 cyc, u32 mask)
+static unsigned long long notrace cyc_to_sched_clock(u32 cyc, u32 mask)
{
u64 epoch_ns;
u32 epoch_cyc;
--
1.7.9.5ml
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html