From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch looks like it should be in the 3.8-stable tree, should we apply
it?
------------------
From: "Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>"
commit ad4e1a7caf937ad395ced585ca85a7d14395dc80 upstream
If index++ calculates from 0, the checking condition of "while
(index++)" fails & it doesn't check any more. It doesn't follow
the loop that used at here.
Replace it by endless loop at here. Then it keeps parsing
"gpio-ranges" property until it ends.
Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index d542a14..ea537fa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip)
if (!np)
return;
- do {
+ for (;; index++) {
ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
"#gpio-range-cells", index, &pinspec);
if (ret)
@@ -257,8 +257,7 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip)
if (ret)
break;
-
- } while (index++);
+ }
}
#else
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html