On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:17:42PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:22:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > It will be only consistent once we've restored all the crtcs. Since a > > bunch of other callers also want to just restore a single crtc, add a > > boolean to disable checking only where it doesn't make sense. > > > > Note that intel_modeset_setup_hw_state already has a call to > > intel_modeset_check_state at the end, so we don't reduce the amount of > > checking. > > > > v2: Try harder not to create a big patch (Chris). > > > > v3: Even smaller (still Chris). Also fix a trailing space. > > > > References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/16/60 > > Cc: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@xxxxxx> > > Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > I'm happy that you are not touching any paths other than mentioned in > the changelog, and that I think being quiet on the modeset is a good use > of the 'force' semantics, so > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next, thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html