Re: + revert-ipc-dont-allocate-a-copy-larger-than-max.patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



11.04.2013 17:24, Greg KH пишет:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:59:45AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
11.04.2013 00:38, Greg KH пишет:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:24:00AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
27.03.2013 05:51, Andrew Morton пишет:
I'm about to disappear for 1.5 weeks.  Stanislav, someone, please let's
get this sorted out!

Hello, Andrew.

Thanks to Peter - he found where the bug is.
And I believe, that his series fixes it.

There is another thread, where we discussed it:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/20/546

There is also my answer to Linus in this message (same thread as above):

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/1/80

with bug description and the small patch, which fixes the problem (in case you'd prefer it instead of reorganising the do_msgrcv()).
I put the patch once more here below:

     ipc: set msg back to -EAGAIN if copy wasn't performed

     Make sure, that msg pointer is set back to error value in case of MSG_COPY
     flag is set and desired message to copy wasn't found. This garantees, that msg
     is either a error pointer or a copy address.
     Otherwise last message in queue will be freed without unlinking from queue
     (which leads to memory corruption) plus dummy allocated copy won't be released.

     Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/ipc/msg.c b/ipc/msg.c
index 31cd1bf..fede1d0 100644
--- a/ipc/msg.c
+++ b/ipc/msg.c
@@ -872,6 +872,7 @@ long do_msgrcv(int msqid, void __user *buf, size_t bufsz, long msgtyp,
                                                         goto out_unlock;
                                                 break;
                                         }
+                                       msg = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
                                 } else
                                         break;
                                 msg_counter++;


So what happened here?

Is there anything that I should do for the 3.8-stable kernel?

thanks,

greg k-h


Yes. This patch should be applied for the 3.8-stable kernel.

I need a corresponding patch in Linus's tree to reference it to as well,
what is the git commit id of that one?

thanks,

greg k-h



Here you are: 	2dc958fa2fe6987e7ab106bd97029a09a82fcd8d

--
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]