On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:04:29PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
[...]
> I guess you mean this patch violates one/both of these rules:
>
> - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
> marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
> security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short, something
> critical.
> - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream).
>
> I'm not sure if the problem "we can't get any hugepage in coredump"
> is considered as 'some "oh, that's not good" issue'.
> But yes, it's not a critical one.
> If you mean I violated the second rule, sorry, I'll get it into upstream first.
The second rule is the clear one. If you are submitting a patch to
a subsystem maintainer and you want it to go into stable branches as
well, you must put 'Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' in the commit message,
not just the mail header.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html