On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:04:20PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:37:00PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > This is a patch to the ASoC driver? I just ignored it since it said it > > was an ARM patch... Anyway, what I'd expect should be happening here is > > that the clock API walks up the tree enabling supply clocks - that would > > mean that either that code isn't there or there's a missing parent child > > relationship in the data. > It changes some things in imx-ssi, sorry, perhaps I should have > splitted it into two patches. > admux clock does not seem to be a physical parent of the ssi clock, so > I don't think it should be a parent in the clock tree. But imx-ssi (or > some other evice) needs this clock to work. As mentioned in the other > response, I will put it directly into clk-imx35.c so this won't be a > patch for ASoC in the next version. If it's the IP that needs the clock then I'd expect the IP to be requesting it so changing the driver does make sense. Do we actually know what the clock does?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature