[PATCH 040/150] tcp: fix double-counted receiver RTT when leaving receiver fast path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



3.5.7.9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit aab2b4bf224ef8358d262f95b568b8ad0cecf0a0 upstream.

We should not update ts_recent and call tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts() both
before and after going to step5. That wastes CPU and double-counts the
receiver-side RTT sample.

Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 3b14d81..410b7c4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -5683,6 +5683,9 @@ int tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 				if (tcp_checksum_complete_user(sk, skb))
 					goto csum_error;
 
+				if ((int)skb->truesize > sk->sk_forward_alloc)
+					goto step5;
+
 				/* Predicted packet is in window by definition.
 				 * seq == rcv_nxt and rcv_wup <= rcv_nxt.
 				 * Hence, check seq<=rcv_wup reduces to:
@@ -5694,9 +5697,6 @@ int tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 				tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts(sk, skb);
 
-				if ((int)skb->truesize > sk->sk_forward_alloc)
-					goto step5;
-
 				NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPHPHITS);
 
 				/* Bulk data transfer: receiver */
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]