On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:53:55AM -0700, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > ----- jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:25:44AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > > > On 03/01/2013 07:14 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > >On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:52:20PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > >>On 02/28/2013 04:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > >>>On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:36:29AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > >>>>On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 04:15:45PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > >>>>>>I'll try to get someone to test this tomorrow. > > > >>>>Btw, you'd need to apply that other patch too > > > >>>> > > > >>>>http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=136206183814547&w=2 > > > >>>> > > > >>>>so that arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() has at least one caller on > > x86_64. > > > >>>Yeah, we already have that applied. It stops crashes in xen > > > >>>environments so we pulled it in as a bugfix. Thanks though! > > > >>> > > > >>Who are "we"? > > > >Sorry, Fedora. That patch has a link to a bug in it. We applied > > the > > > >patch for that bug. I'll apply Boris' patch on top and get the > > same > > > >people to test it. > > > > > > Josh, have you had a chance to test this? > > > > I've tested it on bare metal for a while now. No problems noticed at > > all. I've not heard back from Krishna who was testing it in the Xen > > environment. Krishna? > > > Any updates? No. I've still not heard from Krishna. At this point I've tested it on bare metal quite a bit, and Konrad has tested it on both bare metal and Xen. That should already cover the case Krishna was going to test anyway. I suggest we move forward and take the patch. josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html