On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 07:33:18AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hello, > > On 3/19/2013 3:24 PM, Luis Henriques wrote: > >Hi Marek, > > > >On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:24:21AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > >> commit 9d1400cf79afb49584b4873eb22cd5130cb341db upstream. > >> > >> Atomic pool should always be allocated from DMA zone if such zone is > >> available in the system to avoid issues caused by limited dma mask of > >> any of the devices used for making an atomic allocation. > >> > >> Reported-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [v3.6+] > >> --- > >> Hello, > >> > >> This is a backported version of mainline 9d1400cf79afb49584b commit. > >> It should apply fine to v3.8.y, v3.7.y and v3.6.y stable kernel trees. > > > >Could you confirm this should *not* be added to 3.5 kernels? > > This patch fixes issue introduced by commit > e9da6e9905e639b0f842a244bc770b48ad0523e9, > which has been merged to v3.6-rc1. All v3.5.x and earlier are not > affected by this > bug. I should have added such information to commit message to avoid > confusion. Thank you for confirming this; I'll ignore it for the 3.5 kernel. Cheers, -- Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html