On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 17:22 +0100, Alexander Holler wrote: > > Agreed (thats what my patch did). > > I've introduced a new config option because I don't know if something (a > use case I don't know) relies on the validity check of the dates in the > parser. If there currently isn't such a user, just removing the validity > check in the parser might be enough. Is there *is* such a user, it's broken already. The key could have been loaded (and passed the existing check) *months* ago, expired seconds after it was loaded, and your hypothetical user could still be happily trusting it. > Offering the parsed dates for later usage is still a good idea. Right. -- dwmw2
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature