Re: 2.6.32.y and Revert "block: improve queue_should_plug() by looking at IO depths"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:26:44AM +0100, Thomas Bork wrote:
> On 04.03.2013 23:54, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 
> >I trust you on this, but this time it's me who didn't get this e-mail
> >(I can't find any trace of it here). Care to bounce it back to me ?
> 
> Willy, I forwarded the old message "2.6.32.61" to you.

Just got it and replied, thank you.

> >You're welcome! And please send the one above back to me again so that
> >I can queue it.
> 
> I'll prepare clean patches for all of this tomorrow and post them here. 
> Thank you!
> 
> Attached the first one.

If you want to make any backport, please keep the original patch format
with the commit description and add your signed-off-by at the bottom so
that we keep the workflow intact. And for each patch that is either in
mainline or in another stable branch, please report the original commit
ID in the patch's description. That helps a lot to know whether we are
affected when a regression is reported for this patch.

Best regards,
Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]