Patch "perf/core: Fix pmus_lock vs. pmus_srcu ordering" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    perf/core: Fix pmus_lock vs. pmus_srcu ordering

to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     perf-core-fix-pmus_lock-vs.-pmus_srcu-ordering.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.12 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.



commit 2e9d0f681285b172226a8e222b8dad68111555f1
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Nov 4 14:39:11 2024 +0100

    perf/core: Fix pmus_lock vs. pmus_srcu ordering
    
    [ Upstream commit 2565e42539b120b81a68a58da961ce5d1e34eac8 ]
    
    Commit a63fbed776c7 ("perf/tracing/cpuhotplug: Fix locking order")
    placed pmus_lock inside pmus_srcu, this makes perf_pmu_unregister()
    trip lockdep.
    
    Move the locking about such that only pmu_idr and pmus (list) are
    modified while holding pmus_lock. This avoids doing synchronize_srcu()
    while holding pmus_lock and all is well again.
    
    Fixes: a63fbed776c7 ("perf/tracing/cpuhotplug: Fix locking order")
    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104135517.679556858@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index a0e1d2124727e..5fff74c736063 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -11846,6 +11846,8 @@ void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
 	mutex_lock(&pmus_lock);
 	list_del_rcu(&pmu->entry);
+	idr_remove(&pmu_idr, pmu->type);
+	mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
 
 	/*
 	 * We dereference the pmu list under both SRCU and regular RCU, so
@@ -11855,7 +11857,6 @@ void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu)
 	synchronize_rcu();
 
 	free_percpu(pmu->pmu_disable_count);
-	idr_remove(&pmu_idr, pmu->type);
 	if (pmu_bus_running && pmu->dev && pmu->dev != PMU_NULL_DEV) {
 		if (pmu->nr_addr_filters)
 			device_remove_file(pmu->dev, &dev_attr_nr_addr_filters);
@@ -11863,7 +11864,6 @@ void perf_pmu_unregister(struct pmu *pmu)
 		put_device(pmu->dev);
 	}
 	free_pmu_context(pmu);
-	mutex_unlock(&pmus_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_pmu_unregister);
 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux